Paolo Macchiarini couldn’t just be a simple, good scientist

At the beginning, I followed Dr. Macchiarini misadventures with a distant, respectful eye. I intimately sympathised for a surgeon who traveled the world, who is framed by The Lancet as a great doctor, and who left Italy cursing out its corrupted academic system. Everything he said made sense to me.

from RetractionWatch

via RetractionWatch

It made perfectly sense also to Benita Alexander, the journalist who produced the documentary A Leap of Faith about the surgeon’s life and achievements for the NBC News, an American network. The documentary was aired on June 28th, the same day my blog post about Macchiarini registered more then 1.000 views.

Benita A

Benita Alexander from Twitter

But in a story released this week by Vanity Fair written by Adam Ciralsky – Benita confesses to have fallen in love with the surgeon during the production of the film, raising ethical conflict about her work. The Network became aware of the conflict of interest only later, yet they pursued the idea to submit A Leap of Faith for an Emmy’s nomination.

Needless to say the documentary [which I have not seen] sings the praises of Macchiarini, an undisputed skilled man who – by all means – contributed to medical science. But the story published by Vanity Fair goes far beyond a simple love affair.

In what appears to be the sapient construction of a parallel life, Macchiarini made Benita believe he was the perfect man, whose influence goes beyond the imaginable. After few romantic encounters, Macchiarini said to the journalist to have finally obtained a divorce from his wife, clearing the way to their marriage. The surgeon spoken about a Catholic wedding where not only Pope Francis himself would blessed their union, but he would also preside. These all looked surreal to Benita, yet she decided to trust the man who self-reported to have operated on Vadimir Putin, President Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and Nicolas Sarkozy. All were indeed on the guest list.

from Vanity Fair article - Photograph by Gina LeVay.

from Vanity Fair article – Photograph by Gina LeVay.

Macchiarini framed himself as Supermen. He not only could sit together American’s and Russia’s Presidents, but he could also reunite the Holy and the Lay: on summer last year, during the wedding planning, he anticipated to two gay man (meant to take part to the wedding) that Pope Francis himself would give them Communion as a married homosexuals couple. “I almost fell off my chair” recounted Marchi, one of the two men.

More incredible stories about the fantasies of the surgeon can be read on the article.

The castle began to crack when Benita realised the Pope would not be in Europe on the day of the wedding. As everything started to fall apart, Benita felt embarrassed and silly, while Macchiarini disappeared. It turns out the doctor never divorced from his wife, and Vatican officials stated that “There is no ‘personal doctor’ of the Pope with [the] name ‘Macchiarini'”. The investigation dug further into the surgeon’s past, and found out that the University committee in Florence had good reasons to refuse Macchiarini a Honorary Professorship, as he was found to have “dressed up” his C.V. with recognition he never obtained, and academic positions he never won in different European countries.

As Macchiarini refused to talk about this story, I suspend my judgment.

I first saw Dr. Macchiarini giving an open lecture at Karolinska Institutet years ago, which I believed went live to national television. At the time, Macchiarini had arrived in Sweden from just few months, and everyone in Karolinska was saying good things about him. My trust in him stood over the years of his misadventures. No matter he was accused to ask for money from patients in exchange to better care [charge in part dropped]; no matter he had a little problem with a paper retraction; no matter his new colleagues in Sweden accused him of scientific misconduct [which a recent investigation cleared].

I know personally people who work for and with Paolo. I was shocked as everyone else reading this story.”It’s interesting that wherever he goes, it attracts troubles” I found myself saying to some colleagues who know Macchiarini better then me, just last summer.

Benita Alexander believed Macchiarini the same way I believed him when he was explaining the details of his work at a lecture. I confirm what stated by Ciralsky: he is a charming and smart men. He possibly contributed significantly to the progress of science. Regrettably, these news cast a shadow over his professional achievements. I feel really sorry for him and for the people whose work and reputation may be affected by his behaviour.

I remain puzzled.

 

 

Posted in Karolinska Institutet, Me&Someonelse and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. RSS feed for this post. Leave a trackback.

9 Responses to Paolo Macchiarini couldn’t just be a simple, good scientist

  1. Arthur says:

    Believing in his science is similar to believe in a wedding with Obama Putin and the Pope. incredibly naive

  2. Will monroe says:

    So sad that with his actions and behavior, he has tainted everything he has ever done. After reading this article i and another it sounds as if he has duped a lot of very smart people, but in the end he is just a con man.

  3. Hardie Boys says:

    It’s an interesting article, and raises many questions. The author is clearly very skeptical about Macchiarini, and highlights discrepancies in his CV, for example dates that qualifications were awarded, and academic credentials. But whoever heard of a nuptial mass in which confession was heard? Leaving aside the issue of sexuality, why the Pope would hear the confession of a couple who weren’t getting married?

  4. Jane Dawson says:

    He lied like hell to get into her pants

  5. John Bogal says:

    An interesting turn of events for Paolo but more interesting for Benita don’t you think? its worth thinking about!

  6. Sonia Angelakis says:

    He is a wonderful, serious man of few words.Always devoted to his patients.Never heard him ask for money.as his patient..He is a very serious scientist.What mrs.Alexander says is a highlight of another man.Not Paolo Macchiarini.This whole story in Vanity Fair ,tries to destroy the reputation of one the greatest surgeons in the world!!Shame on mrs.Alexander.The article was only correct on her intentions.Of just having a nice time .having someone else pay for it.Showing off,next to a man like Paolo Macchiarini.Grow up mrs.Alexander try trashing someone closer to your size.He is to big for you.Reaching legendery proportions.Get a Life .

  7. tracehayter says:

    I am so glad to have found this blog, in light of the hate and anger being thrown in Paolo’s direction at this time. I have to echo the words of Sonia Angelakis where she speaks of the story in Vanity Fair of trying to destroy his reputation. I’ve given much thought as to why anyone would want to do this and find it interesting that the story has been published amidst all of the other charges against him. Also, I’m unable to fathom why Paolo would willingly agree to be filmed for the Swedish documentary, Experimenten, if he had anything to hide. Like the author of this blog, I remain puzzled. And I will keep digging for answers.

  8. E Geatti says:

    How unbelievably naive some of these comments are and I note they are mostly from women. The man is a charlatan. He is more outrageous, though slightly quieter, than Donald Trump.

  9. Tracy Goldman says:

    I’m saddened to read of Paolo’s downfall and am shocked at the evidence that has come to light. Several years ago Paolo Macchiarini was speaking with my husband on a regular basis because he was diagnosed with a rare form of tracheal cancer. We were in the process of trying to make arrangements for my husband to have the transplant done by Paolo and I am so grateful that plans fell through and that my husband’s oncologist talked us out of it. Fortunately my husband is doing well and very much alive.

Leave a Reply

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.

SciencePlug is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache

%d bloggers like this: